| 
					     
						   STOP! Do not read another word! Advance mouse to 
						Investopedia.com. Do not pass GO. Do not collect another prospectus.
						 
						 
						   The NYSE advance-decline line has been positive for
						nearly six years!
						 
						 
						 
					    
						 
							
								|  When? | 
								 Up tks | 
								 Down tks | 
								 Net | 
								 Days Up | 
								 Days Down | 
								 New Highs | 
								 New Lows | 
							 
							
								|  From 1/99 | 
								 2,657,563 | 
								 2,566,921 | 
								 90,642 | 
								 894 | 
								 779 | 
								 198,216 | 
								 103,284 | 
							 
							
								|  6/00 - 6/02 | 
								 779,408 | 
								 737,882 | 
								 41,526 | 
								 275 | 
								 225 | 
								 56,287 | 
								 27,296 | 
							 
							
								|  6/00 - 6/03 | 
								 1,185,757 | 
								 1,131,545 | 
								 54,212 | 
								 407 | 
								 341 | 
								 73,945 | 
								 47,474 | 
							 
							
								|  3/03-03/04 | 
								 432,942 | 
								 369,209 | 
								 63,733 | 
								 157 | 
								 91 | 
								 59,076 | 
								 4,386 | 
							 
							
								|  06/00-now | 
								 2,149,469 | 
								 2,002,710 | 
								 146,759 | 
								 743 | 
								 575 | 
								 179,650 | 
								 64,318 | 
							 
							
								|  04/00 to now | 
								 2,206,288 | 
								 2,065,750 | 
								 140,538 | 
								 763 | 
								 596 | 
								 181,557 | 
								 66,935 | 
							 
						 
						
					    
						 
						   Note: Statistics gathered manually from various
						sources, certainly may be off a few percent in either direction.
						 
						 
						   What is wrong with the averages? How sick are the
						Mutual Funds?
						 
						 
						   Here are some questions you should be asking. 1) Is
						there "Investment Life" after Mutual Funds? 2) What is the average
						investor/speculator to do? (3) Who can you trust? (4) Why are people still
						throwing money at the corrupt Mutual Funds? 5) Is there a safe(r)
						alternative? 6) Can a financial professional function without funds? (7)
						Did Mutual Funds make YOU lose money over the past several years? (Answers
						below.)
						 
						 
						   Investing always involves more questions than
						answers, and the idea that Wall Street has those answers and that they are
						imbedded in the products that they market to the "moneyed" public, is
						simply part of the brainwashing of the American investor. So, too, is the
						myth that Mutual Funds are a safer investment mechanism than a properly
						constructed portfolio of individual securities. Perhaps they should be, in
						concept. In reality, they haven't been for decades.
						 
						 
						   Investors have always searched for a safe and easy
						way to protect and to grow their portfolios. This used to be accomplished
						by applying a combination of management and investment principles to the
						process. A diversified portfolio of high quality, profitable companies, and
						an appropriate amount of less volatile income producers was pretty easy to
						create, to manage, and to monitor.
						 
						 
						   It still is, when you realize that investing is not
						a competitive event. The original Mutual Fund managers actually knew how to
						do this, were paid to do it, and were not at all influenced by the
						incredible confluence of outside forces that impacts their decision making
						today. In their original form, Mutual Funds were Trustee directed within
						the retirement benefit community, and a stepping-stone to a properly
						diversified, individual security portfolio on the personal level. Before
						the three-ring Wall Street circus came to town, there were only two
						"classes" of securities, retirement programs were not self-directed, the
						DJIA was an economic indicator, investing was a personal goal directed
						activity, and the Yankees won the American league pennant most of the time.
						 
						 
						   Almost everything (except the Yankees) changed with
						the onslaught of the "new generation" of Mutual Fund marketeers and self-
						directed retirement vehicles. Wall Street invented market prediction
						techniques and new subdivisions of securities; investment products were
						mass-produced in every shape, size, model, and color, with great financial
						planning success; sales literature was sold as research/analysis, and
						financial institutions became indistinguishable from one another. People
						pay extra not to collect current interest and loss-taking is seen as a good
						idea. Unproven team-player Mutual Fund managers receive signing bonuses
						that would shock professional athletes, and 60-second sound bites on CNBC
						define today's investment reality to the masses. A calendar year is now
						long-term, buy high/sell low a religion, and absolutely everyone, from
						accountants to wedding planners, can sell Mutual Funds for extra cash. Wall
						Street is Las Vegas in pinstripes and red suspenders.
						 
						 
						   Are today's late trading, market timing, and
						executive suite scandals going to change things dramatically? It's
						doubtful, simply because Mutual Funds are so profitable for the
						institutions, so mindlessly easy to sell for financial professionals, AND
						the only available investment medium for hundreds of millions of employees
						throughout the country! But is there a better way to invest safely and
						profitably in spite of all the problems? You can't afford to be lazy
						anymore. Learn how to manage a high quality, diversified portfolio of
						individual securities.
						 
						 
						   --------------------------------------------------
						 
						 
						   Answering the six questions raised in the first
						paragraph, from the pages of the Business Best Seller: "The Brainwashing of
						the American Investor". Yes Virginia, there is investment life after Mutual
						Funds. (2) Rediscover individual securities, after taking a crash course in
						the principles of investing. (3) Trust yourself, once you've taken the
						course. (4) Most investors have no choice but to use Funds, the others
						learn their lessons slowly. (5) Yes, individual securities in a plain
						vanilla investment plan can be much safer. (6) Some planners have de-toxed
						from funds, but it's a lot more like work. Most won't try. (7) Nope, you'll
						have to take the blame for the losses yourself.
						 
						 
						   Steve Selengut
					     
					   |